Comparison
ccusage vs CodexBar — trackers compared
How ccusage and CodexBar compare as AI coding usage trackers — the honest facts, side by side.
| Attribute | ccusage | CodexBar | JP the Cat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Free (open source) | Free | $12.99 one-time (+$9.99/Mac) |
| Theme | n/a | dark | light |
| Open source | Yes | Yes | No |
| Form factor | CLI | menu bar | menu bar |
| Shows | real $ cost | quota % | real $ (Claude) + official % / notional $ (Codex) |
| Providers | Claude Code (Codex via plugins) | 56 providers | Claude Code + Codex live, 60 more on roadmap |
ccusage
The dominant free CLI. Prices all cache-creation at the single 5-minute rate (issue #899), under-billing 1-hour cache writes by ~60%. Price: Free (open source). Shows: real $ cost.
CodexBar
Free menu-bar quota meter; tracks rate-limit windows, not computed dollar cost. Price: Free. Shows: quota %.
Common questions
- Is ccusage or CodexBar better?
- They serve different needs — ccusage shows real $ cost, CodexBar shows quota %. The table lays out the facts so you can choose.